Comment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Natural Science
@Azuaron I think that it would be properly properly answerable; the number of neutrons is independent of atomic number. It might be possible with a few very minor fundamental changes to the laws of...
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Natural Science
@10Replies discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/25364/…
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Natural Science
Aww, what's wrong with this? :P
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Natural Science
Probably not much aside from a few tiny changes in distance and speed. I think that the real huge effect would be its transit; such planets are typically in transit every 4 days or so and block out a...
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Natural Science
VtCing as off-topic; this definitely goes on [worldbuilding.se].
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Natural Science
There probably wouldn't be such a thing as vitamin D.
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Natural Science
This is probably more of a statistical problem than anything else.
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Natural Science
Yup, I'm sorry, but there is no better spot for this than Worldbuilding. And even there, it would probably be closed as Too Broad.
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Science
Already covered in at least a dozen other sites but aaahhh pffff.
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Science
This is MUCH too common on other sites.
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Science
@kaine well… that could be said for any of these questions.
View ArticleComment by Stephen Leppik on Speculative Science
Inspired by panel 10 in this game of Drawception.
View Article
